Singapore gazettes Master Plan 2014 as its statutory land use plan, concluding the review of the Draft Master Plan 2013

All 75 heritage buildings that the Draft Master Plan 2013 proposed for conservation were gazetted as part of Master Plan 2014 on 6 June 2014.

Gazetted, and a count fixed on the gazette. The draft release said "over 70 buildings will be conserved", a floor rather than a count, and no value is stored for it. The list of buildings is Annex A of the release, which was not read; the draft named the Queenstown Library, Alexandra Hospital and the former Commonwealth Avenue Wet Market among them.

The draft made provision for greenery such that around 90% of residents would live within 400 metres of a park.

Proposed in the draft, and approximate. URA wrote "around 90%", which is not sharpened. It is a planning provision, not a measured share of residents, and the gazette release does not restate it.

The Master Plan Written Statement 2014 interprets 31 zonings in its Table 1, from Residential to Special Use.

Written statement, a count with no before-value. The 2008 table was not transcribed, so the count is not evidence of any change from Master Plan 2008.

The draft proposed new housing areas at Bidadari, Tampines North and Punggol, and the rejuvenation of Sembawang, Yishun, Hougang and Choa Chu Kang with new homes.

Proposed in the draft, at area level only. A proposal, not a land use control, and stated with no boundary, density or number of homes. The gazette release does not say whether the gazetted plan carried it unchanged.

The draft proposed growing regional employment centres at Jurong Lake District, Tampines Regional Centre and Paya Lebar Central, new growth areas along the North Coast Innovation Corridor including the Woodlands Regional Centre, and new industrial sites in the west and north-east.

Proposed in the draft, at area level only. The industrial sites named are CleanTech Park, Wenya, Jurong West, Tuas, Seletar West and Lorong Halus. The release also names the Punggol Learning Corridor and Creative Cluster. No floor area, boundary or land use control is stated, and the gazette release does not restate any of these areas.

URA said the relocation of the City Terminals by 2027 and Pasir Panjang Terminal thereafter would free up 1,000 hectares for future development, and exhibited preliminary conceptual plans for a Greater Southern Waterfront.

Proposed in the draft as long-term intent. URA called the waterfront plans preliminary and conceptual, said the plan "will be worked out over the coming years" and invited ideas. It is not a land use control and nothing here gives the waterfront a land use.

URA described Master Plan 2014 as the statutory land use plan guiding Singapore's physical development for the medium term, and the Master Plan as reviewed every five years and showing the permissible land use and density for every parcel of land.

Gazetted, a description of the instrument. The parcel-level land use and density are in the plan's maps, which Prevo does not hold for 2014, and no parcel state is stored in this event.

Objections to and representations on the draft's proposals for amendment to the Master Plan had to be made in writing to the Permanent Secretary of the Ministry of National Development by 19 December 2013.

Proposed in the draft, and the consultation step. The release calls the draft's contents "proposals for amendment to the Master Plan", which is the release's own statement that they were not in force. It does not say how objections were decided.

The Master Plan Written Statement 2014 says the plan's contents guide physical development through development control, confer no development rights and are not the basis for development charge or temporary development levy liability.

Written statement, and unchanged from 2008. The Written Statement 2008 carries the same sentence. Clause 6.1 of the 2014 statement treats the plot ratios in the plan as the maximum permissible intensity, and clause 6.2 says the intensity permitted may be lower.

The Master Plan Written Statement 2014 dates an amendment's effect from the Minister's approval and counts as Amendment Plans those in amendments to the Master Plan made on or after 27 May 2014.

Written statement, and not a date of effect for this plan. Neither Written Statement says what happened on 27 May 2014 or, in 2008, on 27 November 2008, and no held document states when the Minister approved Master Plan 2014. The date is stored as the statement's own wording and is not read as an approval or effective date.

The Chief Planner gazetted Master Plan 2014 on 6 June 2014, and URA announced the gazette the same day.

Gazetted, the statutory date. The release states the gazette date in terms. It gives no Gazette notification number, and no held document states when the Minister approved the plan.

The gazette concluded URA's review of the Draft Master Plan 2013, which had been exhibited in November 2013 for a month and whose review included consultations with Members of Parliament, grassroots leaders and professional institutions.

Gazetted, and the link from draft to plan. The Written Statement says the amended plans were formalised as Master Plan 2014 "After incorporating relevant feedback from the public exhibitions". Neither document lists which draft proposals changed. The release calls the review "year-long", and no length in days is derived from it.

The Draft Master Plan 2013 exhibition opened on 20 November 2013 and ran at The URA Centre until 19 December 2013, with the draft also on URA's website.

Proposed in the draft, not in force. These are the dates a draft was published for comment. The draft changed no control on 20 November 2013 or on any later date; controls changed with the gazette of 6 June 2014 (claim 1). The canonical notes gave these dates from a secondary source only; they now rest on URA's own release.

URA said the key focus of the Draft Master Plan 2013 was to build townships for all ages that are green, healthy and connected, and to bring quality jobs closer to home.

Ura's stated aim for the draft, not an observed effect. The six thrusts were housing, jobs near home, green and recreational space, heritage and identity, transport connectivity and public spaces.

The Master Plan Written Statement 2014 records the Master Plan as having undergone nine reviews since its approval in 1958, where the Written Statement 2008 of Master Plan 2008 recorded eight.

Written statement, and the predecessor. The two prefaces place Master Plan 2008 as the plan of the previous review. The Written Statement 2008 was read from a capture of September 2013, before the draft exhibition, and states no date on which Master Plan 2008 was approved, gazetted or took effect.

The gazette is the date the reviewed plan became the basis for development control, and the draft's named areas are the Government's stated intentions for this cycle rather than a record of what the gazetted plan set for any site.

Prevo's reading, not a Government statement. The inputs are verified. That the draft's areas survived into the gazetted plan cannot be confirmed from the releases, which do not compare the two, and Prevo holds no Master Plan 2014 geometry to check it.