Singapore · Tax policy
Singapore raises Land Betterment Charge rates for five of nine use groups from 1 September 2026
On 31 August 2026 the Singapore Land Authority published revised Land Betterment Charge rates for the half year from 1 September 2026 to 28 February 2027.
Announced 31 August 2026 · Effective 1 September 2026
Original rule
as at 1 September 2026
Current position
as at 1 September 2026
Land Betterment Charge, non-landed residential, sector 54
S$9,940 per sq m of gross floor area
Land Betterment Charge, non-landed residential, sector 54
No amendment recorded in this archive
Land Betterment Charge, non-landed residential, sectors 55 and 56
S$9,520 per sq m of gross floor area
Land Betterment Charge, non-landed residential, sectors 55 and 56
No amendment recorded in this archive
Land Betterment Charge, commercial, sector 96
S$8,750 per sq m of gross floor area
Land Betterment Charge, commercial, sector 96
No amendment recorded in this archive
Land Betterment Charge, landed residential, sector 67
S$22,330 per sq m of gross floor area
Land Betterment Charge, landed residential, sector 67
No amendment recorded in this archive
Land Betterment Charge, commercial, sector 42
S$18,550 per sq m of gross floor area
Land Betterment Charge, commercial, sector 42
No amendment recorded in this archive
Land Betterment Charge, non-landed residential, sector 43
S$15,540 per sq m of gross floor area
Land Betterment Charge, non-landed residential, sector 43
No amendment recorded in this archive
Land Betterment Charge, industrial, sector 111
S$2,898 per sq m of gross floor area
Land Betterment Charge, industrial, sector 111
No amendment recorded in this archive
Event facts
- Announced
- 31 August 2026
- Effective
- 1 September 2026
- Announcement to effective
- 1 day
- Regulator
- Singapore Land Authority, Urban Redevelopment Authority
- Instruments and scope
- Land in Singapore on which Land Betterment Charge is assessed by the Table of Rates method, where the chargeable consent is a Provisional Permission granted on or after 1 September 2026, or a second or subsequent extension to a Provisional Permission granted on or after that date. The table covers 118 geographical sectors and nine use groups, with Use Groups A to E stated per sq m of gross floor area and Use Groups F to H per sq m of land area. Cases assessed under the Valuation method rather than the Table of Rates method sit outside the table.
- Claim 3
- 1.7%[Singapore Land Authority press release, 31 August 2026, paragraph 3]
- Claim 5
- 3.5%An unweighted average including ten sectors that did not move. No single sector rose by 3.5%.[Singapore Land Authority press release, 31 August 2026, paragraph 4]
- Claim 7
- 3.4%An average including 48 sectors that did not move. Sector outcomes run from no change to 29%.[Singapore Land Authority press release, 31 August 2026, paragraph 5]
- Claim 10
- 3.9%The largest average, not the largest single move. Sector 54 in Use Group B2 rose 29.09%.[Singapore Land Authority press release, 31 August 2026, paragraphs 7 and 8]
- Claim 12
- 2.9%[Singapore Land Authority press release, 31 August 2026, paragraph 8]
- Claim 14
- 118 geographical sectors[Singapore Land Authority press release, 31 August 2026, paragraph 9, first sentence, with Appendix 2 of that release compared against Appendix 2 of the 27 February 2026 release]
- Claim 18
- 9940 S$ per sq m of gross floor areaOne sector of 118, and a tax rate per sq m of gross floor area, not a land price.[Singapore Land Authority press release, 31 August 2026, Appendix 1, sector 54 row, Use Group B2 column; the same row and column in Appendix 1 of the 27 February 2026 release for the March 2026 rate; Annex A, Table for Land Betterment Charge Rates per Square Metre, September 2026, against which all 1,062 cells were checked]
- Claim 19
- 9520 S$ per sq m of gross floor area[Singapore Land Authority press release, 31 August 2026, Appendix 1, sectors 55 and 56 rows, Use Group B2 column; the same rows and column in Appendix 1 of the 27 February 2026 release for the March 2026 rates]
- Claim 20
- 8750 S$ per sq m of gross floor area[Singapore Land Authority press release, 31 August 2026, Appendix 1, sector 96 row, Use Group A column; the same row and column in Appendix 1 of the 27 February 2026 release for the March 2026 rate]
- Claim 21
- 22330 S$ per sq m of gross floor area[Singapore Land Authority press release, 31 August 2026, Appendix 1, sector 67 row, Use Group B1 column; the same row and column in Appendix 1 of the 27 February 2026 release for the March 2026 rate]
- Claim 22
- 18550 S$ per sq m of gross floor area[Singapore Land Authority press release, 31 August 2026, Appendix 1, sector 42 row, Use Group A column; the same row and column in Appendix 1 of the 27 February 2026 release for the March 2026 rate]
- Claim 23
- 15540 S$ per sq m of gross floor area[Singapore Land Authority press release, 31 August 2026, Appendix 1, sector 43 row, Use Group B2 column; the same row and column in Appendix 1 of the 27 February 2026 release for the March 2026 rate]
- Claim 24
- 2898 S$ per sq m of gross floor area[Singapore Land Authority press release, 31 August 2026, Appendix 1, sector 111 row, Use Group D column; the same row and column in Appendix 1 of the 27 February 2026 release for the March 2026 rate]
- Claim 25
- 19110 S$ per sq m of gross floor area[Singapore Land Authority press release, 31 August 2026, Appendix 1, sectors 41 and 42 rows, Use Group C column; the same rows and column in Appendix 1 of the 27 February 2026 release]
- Claim 27
- 34 S$ per sq m of land area[Singapore Land Authority press release, 31 August 2026, Appendix 1, Use Group G column read across all 118 rows, with sector 96 the first row carrying a rate; the same column in Appendix 1 of the 27 February 2026 release]
- Claim 29
- 1 months[Singapore Land Authority Land Betterment Charge page, the introductory explanation immediately before the computation-method paragraphs, retrieved 1 September 2026]
- Before this framework
- The rates in force were those published on 27 February 2026 for the half year from 1 March 2026 to 31 August 2026, across the same 118 geographical sectors and the same nine use groups. In that table the non-landed residential rate in sectors 54, 55 and 56 stood at a common S$7,700 per sq m of gross floor area, the landed residential rate in sector 67 was S$20,650, the commercial rate in sector 42 was S$17,850, and Use Group E ran in three contiguous bands at S$1,022, S$812 and S$427. The March 2026 release recorded no change to the Use Groups Table and no change to the geographical sectors.
- Positioning at introduction
- The Singapore Land Authority states that the rates were revised following a review conducted in consultation with the Chief Valuer. The release gives a reason for one use group only: rates for places of worship and civic and community institutions rose to keep pace with the overall growth in land values. It offers no reason for the movements in the other four use groups, and publishes neither the valuation evidence, nor the transactions considered, nor the method by which sector rates or the published averages were derived.
- Current status
- Active as introduced, no amendment recorded in this archive.
The 30-second brief
On 31 August 2026 the Singapore Land Authority published the Land Betterment Charge rates for the half year from 1 September 2026 to 28 February 2027. Five of the nine use groups rose on average: commercial 1.7%, landed residential 3.5%, non-landed residential 3.4%, industrial 3.9%, and places of worship and civic and community institutions 2.9%. Four did not move anywhere on the island. The largest single move was in sector 54, where the non-landed residential rate went from S$7,700 to S$9,940 per sq m of gross floor area, and sectors 55 and 56 rose from that same base to S$9,520. Boundaries were redrawn in four sectors. The rates reach a case by the date its Provisional Permission is granted, not by the date it is assessed or paid.
Key numbers
What changed
THE TABLE, NOT THE CHARGE. The use groups, the assessment methods, the number of geographical sectors, the half-yearly cycle, the role of the Chief Valuer, the one-month payment period and the S$1,100 baseline processing fee are all as they were. What moved is the rate table, and the boundaries of sectors 7, 16, 23 and 35. Adding the per-group counts the release itself states gives 460 of the 1,062 cells: every sector in Use Groups D and E, 108 of 118 in B1, 70 in B2 and 46 in A. Four groups moved nowhere on the island, C, F, G and H, and that is worth stating because a frozen rate and an unrevised one look identical to a reader glancing at one sector.
Why it matters
### The published averages are not what a sector experienced Every one of the five group averages is taken across all 118 sectors, including the sectors that did not move. For Use Group B2 that means 48 zeros are inside a 3.4% average, and the 70 sectors that did move rose by 5.7% on average. So a developer reading "B2 rose 3.4%" and applying it to a site is using a number that describes the table rather than any parcel. The method is a reconstruction: taking the unweighted mean of the per-sector percentage change across all 118 sectors reproduces all five published figures to the decimal shown, while weighting by rate level does not. The Singapore Land Authority states no method, so open item 2 keeps that as an inference rather than a fact. ### The 29% is a band, not an outlier Sectors 54, 55 and 56 all sat at S$7,700 per sq m of gross floor area in March 2026. Sector 54 went to S$9,940 and the other two to S$9,520. Three adjacent sectors moving off one base in one cycle is a repricing of a band, and reporting sector 54 alone as an anomaly would describe the wrong event. What is not available is the reason: the release names no sector, gives no cause, and publishes none of the valuation evidence. ### Four sectors are not the same ground they were Sector numbers 7, 16, 23 and 35 in the March table and the same numbers in the September table do not describe identical land. The rate comparisons for those sectors are still arithmetically correct, because they compare what was published against each number, but they cannot support a conclusion about a parcel that crossed an adjusted boundary. Sector 23 and sector 35 both carry above-average moves, and neither can be separated from the boundary change without the maps. This archive does not hold them. ### The date that decides a case is the grant A proposal granted Provisional Permission on 31 August 2026 is on the March table. The same proposal granted on 1 September is on the September one. The Liability Order can issue months later and does not move the case. For an industrial proposal in sector 73 that difference is S$2,359 against S$2,597 per sq m of gross floor area, decided by which side of one date a decision by the Urban Redevelopment Authority happened to fall.
What happened next
The half-yearly revision effective 1 March 2027
Direction of the published residential averages at the March 2027 revision
Show detail
Direction of the published residential averages at the March 2027 revision
Interpretation
The published average increase for landed residential slowed from 4% at the March 2026 revision to 3.5% here, and for non-landed residential from 4.1% to 3.4%. Two observations are not a trend, and the deceleration is small enough that a single cycle can reverse it. The test is worth pre-registering anyway, because it is the only forward question this event supports that is answered by a document the Singapore Land Authority reliably publishes on a known cadence. Any reading of it inherits the reconstruction problem at open item 2: the averaging method is inferred rather than stated, so a comparison across cycles assumes the method did not change.
Why this grade
No grade is assigned. This records the direction of a published figure across two revisions, not a market response to anything, and the rates are set by reference to land values, so the figure moves with the market rather than against it.
The revisions effective 1 March 2027 and 1 September 2027
Whether the sector 54, 55 and 56 non-landed residential repricing is sustained
Show detail
Whether the sector 54, 55 and 56 non-landed residential repricing is sustained
Interpretation
The three sectors shared one March 2026 rate of S$7,700 per sq m of gross floor area and all three received unusually large increases in the same cycle, which is the signature of a band being repriced rather than of three separate assessments. The reason is unavailable: nothing held names the valuation evidence or the transactions the Chief Valuer considered. A later reversal would show the September 2026 levels were not maintained; it would not establish why either move happened.
Why this grade
No grade is assigned. The observation is whether a published rate holds, and the archive holds nothing that would attribute either the rise or a reversal.
August and September 2026
Concentration of Provisional Permission grants before the effective date
Show detail
Concentration of Provisional Permission grants before the effective date
Interpretation
AN OBSERVATION THE ONE-DAY WINDOW ALREADY DISQUALIFIES AS A CAUSAL TEST. Rising rates give an applicant an economic preference for an earlier grant, but the trigger is a grant by the Urban Redevelopment Authority rather than an act of the applicant, and the revision was published on 31 August for a 1 September effective date, so nobody could act on the announcement inside the window. Any clustering found in August 2026 would therefore belong to the half-yearly cadence, which is public and predictable, rather than to this announcement. Record the numbers if they become available and attribute nothing to them. Publicly available Urban Redevelopment Authority statistics may in any case not be granular enough to separate relevant grants from the rest.
Why this grade
No grade is assigned, and none is available. The announcement preceded the effective date by one day and the trigger is outside the applicant's control, so no observed concentration could be attributed to this event.
Conditional on Urban Redevelopment Authority grant data being published at sufficient granularity, which it may never be.
From 1 September 2026, as Liability Orders issue for sites near the adjusted boundaries
Whether the boundary adjustments change the sector a parcel is assessed in
Show detail
Whether the boundary adjustments change the sector a parcel is assessed in
Interpretation
A boundary change moves a parcel between sectors, which changes the applicable rate independently of any rate movement, so a site can face a different charge in September 2026 without its own sector rate having moved at all. The archive cannot test this yet: the September 2026 sector maps are not held, the March 2026 maps have not been set against them, and Liability Orders are not published. Open item 1 is the precondition. Until it closes, the qualification on claim 15 is the only guard the published page carries.
Why this grade
No grade is assigned. This asks whether a redrawn boundary moved a parcel, which is a question about a map rather than about a market response.
Neither September 2026 sector map is held, and Liability Orders are not public.
The case for
The revision is what the regime is designed to do. Rates that track land values keep the charge proportionate to the uplift being taxed, and the Singapore Land Authority states the review was conducted with the Chief Valuer on the published half-yearly cadence. Nothing in the table looks arbitrary against that purpose: four use groups did not move at all, Use Group E moved as three blocks by roughly the same percentage everywhere, and the industrial column moved in every sector within a narrow band. The one instrument the release explains is the one where the explanation is most needed, since places of worship and civic and community institutions have no market transaction to read a rate off.
The case against
The publication tells a reader almost nothing about how the numbers were reached. Five averages are stated with no method, and the method that reproduces them had to be inferred here from two tables. Three sectors were repriced by 20% or more with no sector named and no reason given. Four boundaries were redrawn and described as minor, with no measure of the land moved and the maps published as separate documents a reader has to go and find. None of that is a defect in the rates, and all of it means a developer cannot check the figure that decides the charge against anything except the table itself.
What this view assumes
- The September 2026 and March 2026 tables were read correctly, which the cell by cell agreement between the press release and the standalone Annex A across all 1,062 cells supports.
- The published group averages are unweighted means of the per-sector percentage change across all 118 sectors, which reproduces every one of the five figures and is an inference rather than a stated method.
- Sector numbers other than 7, 16, 23 and 35 describe the same ground in both tables, which the release implies by naming only four adjustments.
What we don't know
- What the boundary adjustments to sectors 7, 16, 23 and 35 actually moved, and whether any parcel changed sector
- How the Singapore Land Authority computes the published use group averages
- Why the non-landed residential rate in sectors 54, 55 and 56 was repriced, and what valuation evidence supported it
- What happens to a first extension to a Provisional Permission granted on or after 1 September 2026
- The subsidiary legislation applicable from 1 September 2026, and whether the legally prescribed table matches the table published by the Singapore Land Authority
- What the dash in the Use Group G column means in sectors 1 to 95
Prevo view
InterpretationThis is a routine revision whose value to a reader lies almost entirely in the three qualifications around it. The headline figures are safe to repeat and useless to apply: none of the five averages describes a sector, and the one most likely to be quoted, 3.4% for non-landed residential, is 5.7% among the sectors that actually moved. The sector 54 to 56 move is the item worth a practitioner's attention, because a band repriced by 24% to 29% in one cycle changes a residual land valuation in a way a group average never signals. And the boundary adjustments quietly break the one assumption everybody makes when comparing two tables, which is that a sector number means the same thing in both. The archive publishes this event with the rate arithmetic confirmed and that last assumption explicitly unconfirmed for four sectors.
Confidence: MEDIUM-HIGH
What would change this view: The September 2026 sector maps, set against the maps in force for March 2026, would settle whether the boundary adjustments moved any parcel and would allow the above-average movements in sectors 23 and 35 to be read as rate changes rather than as possible boundary artefacts. A statement from the Singapore Land Authority on how the group averages are computed would turn the reconstruction into a fact and make a cross-cycle series defensible. Retrieving the subsidiary legislation in force from 1 September 2026 would let the archive cite the operative law rather than the press release, and would settle whether the prescribed table and the published table agree.
Evidence check
- Claim 1 The Land Betterment Charge rates for the period from 1 September 2026 to 28 February 2027 were revised following a review by the Singapore Land Authority conducted in consultation with the Chief Valuer.[Singapore Land Authority press release, 31 August 2026, paragraph 1]
- Claim 2 Rates increased for Use Groups A, B1, B2, D and E, and remained unchanged for Use Groups C, F, G and H.[Singapore Land Authority press release, 31 August 2026, paragraph 2]
- Claim 3 The rates for Use Group A, commercial, increased by 1.7% on average.[Singapore Land Authority press release, 31 August 2026, paragraph 3]
- Claim 4 For Use Group A, 46 of the 118 sectors saw an increase of about 3% to 19%, and the remaining 72 sectors saw no change.[Singapore Land Authority press release, 31 August 2026, paragraph 3]
- Claim 5 The rates for Use Group B1, residential landed, increased by 3.5% on average.[Singapore Land Authority press release, 31 August 2026, paragraph 4]
- Claim 6 For Use Group B1, 108 of the 118 sectors saw an increase of about 2% to 8%, and the remaining 10 sectors saw no change.[Singapore Land Authority press release, 31 August 2026, paragraph 4]
- Claim 7 The rates for Use Group B2, residential non-landed, increased by 3.4% on average.[Singapore Land Authority press release, 31 August 2026, paragraph 5]
- Claim 8 For Use Group B2, 70 of the 118 sectors saw an increase of about 1% to 29%, and the remaining 48 sectors saw no change.[Singapore Land Authority press release, 31 August 2026, paragraph 5]
- Claim 9 The rates for Use Group C, covering hotel and hospital uses, remain unchanged.[Singapore Land Authority press release, 31 August 2026, paragraph 6, with the September 2026 and March 2026 Appendix 1 tables compared cell by cell]
- Claim 10 The rates for Use Group D, industrial, increased by 3.9% on average, and every sector rose.[Singapore Land Authority press release, 31 August 2026, paragraphs 7 and 8]
- Claim 11 For Use Group D, all 118 sectors saw increments of about 2% to 10%.[Singapore Land Authority press release, 31 August 2026, paragraph 7]
- Claim 12 The rates for Use Group E, covering places of worship and civic and community institutions, increased by 2.9% on average across all sectors, which the release attributes to keeping pace with the overall growth in land values.[Singapore Land Authority press release, 31 August 2026, paragraph 8]
- Claim 13 The rates for Use Groups F, G and H remain unchanged.[Singapore Land Authority press release, 31 August 2026, paragraph 2, with the September 2026 and March 2026 Appendix 1 tables compared cell by cell]
- Claim 14 There are no changes to the Use Groups Table, and the number of geographical sectors remains 118.[Singapore Land Authority press release, 31 August 2026, paragraph 9, first sentence, with Appendix 2 of that release compared against Appendix 2 of the 27 February 2026 release]
- Claim 15 Boundary adjustments described as minor were made to geographical sectors 7, 16, 23 and 35, to align with the land parcel zoning demarcations in the Urban Redevelopment Authority's Master Plan 2025.[Singapore Land Authority press release, 31 August 2026, paragraph 9, second sentence]
- Claim 16 The revised rates take effect from 1 September 2026 and apply to cases granted Provisional Permission, or a second or subsequent extension to a Provisional Permission, on or after that date.[Singapore Land Authority press release, 31 August 2026, paragraph 10]
- Claim 17 Rates for Use Groups A to E are stated per square metre of gross floor area, and rates for Use Groups F to H per square metre of land area.[Singapore Land Authority press release, 31 August 2026, the note beneath the Appendix 1 table]
- Claim 18 In sector 54, the Use Group B2 rate rose from S$7,700 to S$9,940 per square metre of gross floor area, the largest single-sector increase in this revision.[Singapore Land Authority press release, 31 August 2026, Appendix 1, sector 54 row, Use Group B2 column; the same row and column in Appendix 1 of the 27 February 2026 release for the March 2026 rate; Annex A, Table for Land Betterment Charge Rates per Square Metre, September 2026, against which all 1,062 cells were checked]
- Claim 19 In sectors 55 and 56, the Use Group B2 rate rose from S$7,700 to S$9,520 per square metre of gross floor area, from the same March 2026 base as sector 54.[Singapore Land Authority press release, 31 August 2026, Appendix 1, sectors 55 and 56 rows, Use Group B2 column; the same rows and column in Appendix 1 of the 27 February 2026 release for the March 2026 rates]
- Claim 20 In sector 96, the Use Group A rate rose from S$7,350 to S$8,750 per square metre of gross floor area, the largest commercial increase in this revision.[Singapore Land Authority press release, 31 August 2026, Appendix 1, sector 96 row, Use Group A column; the same row and column in Appendix 1 of the 27 February 2026 release for the March 2026 rate]
- Claim 21 In sector 67, the Use Group B1 rate rose from S$20,650 to S$22,330 per square metre of gross floor area, which is both the largest landed residential increase and the highest landed residential rate in the table.[Singapore Land Authority press release, 31 August 2026, Appendix 1, sector 67 row, Use Group B1 column; the same row and column in Appendix 1 of the 27 February 2026 release for the March 2026 rate]
- Claim 22 In sector 42, the Use Group A rate rose from S$17,850 to S$18,550 per square metre of gross floor area, the highest commercial rate in the table.[Singapore Land Authority press release, 31 August 2026, Appendix 1, sector 42 row, Use Group A column; the same row and column in Appendix 1 of the 27 February 2026 release for the March 2026 rate]
- Claim 23 In sector 43, the Use Group B2 rate rose from S$14,700 to S$15,540 per square metre of gross floor area, the highest non-landed residential rate in the table.[Singapore Land Authority press release, 31 August 2026, Appendix 1, sector 43 row, Use Group B2 column; the same row and column in Appendix 1 of the 27 February 2026 release for the March 2026 rate]
- Claim 24 In sector 111, the Use Group D rate rose from S$2,758 to S$2,898 per square metre of gross floor area, the highest industrial rate in the table.[Singapore Land Authority press release, 31 August 2026, Appendix 1, sector 111 row, Use Group D column; the same row and column in Appendix 1 of the 27 February 2026 release for the March 2026 rate]
- Claim 25 In sectors 41 and 42, the Use Group C rate stayed at S$19,110 per square metre of gross floor area, the highest rate recorded in Use Group C.[Singapore Land Authority press release, 31 August 2026, Appendix 1, sectors 41 and 42 rows, Use Group C column; the same rows and column in Appendix 1 of the 27 February 2026 release]
- Claim 26 Use Group E takes only three distinct values across the whole table, at S$1,050 per square metre in sectors 1 to 91, S$840 in sectors 92 to 115 and S$441 in sectors 116 to 118, each band contiguous.[Singapore Land Authority press release, 31 August 2026, Appendix 1, Use Group E column read across all 118 rows, with sector 92 the first row of the middle band; the same column in Appendix 1 of the 27 February 2026 release for the March 2026 values]
- Claim 27 The Use Group G column shows a dash in sectors 1 to 95 and a rate of S$34 per square metre of land area in sectors 96 to 118, unchanged from March 2026.[Singapore Land Authority press release, 31 August 2026, Appendix 1, Use Group G column read across all 118 rows, with sector 96 the first row carrying a rate; the same column in Appendix 1 of the 27 February 2026 release]
- Claim 28 The Land Betterment Charge is a tax on the increase in the value of land arising from a chargeable consent, and it replaced Differential Premium, Development Charge and Temporary Development Levy with effect from 1 August 2022.[Singapore Land Authority Land Betterment Charge page, opening paragraph of the page body, retrieved 1 September 2026]
- Claim 29 After a planning application or plan lodgment has been submitted to the Urban Redevelopment Authority, the landowner makes no separate application to the Singapore Land Authority for payment of Land Betterment Charge. Where the proposed development results in an increase in land value, the Singapore Land Authority issues a Liability Order stating the amount payable, and payment falls due within one month from the date of that order.[Singapore Land Authority Land Betterment Charge page, the introductory explanation immediately before the computation-method paragraphs, retrieved 1 September 2026]
- Causally established outcomes
- 0
- Interpretive sections, not claim-verifiableWhy it matters, Prevo View, The case for, The case against
- 4
Policy facts verified29
How this is scored
Counts are by provenance, meaning who established the claim, not by how confident we are. A policy fact is one the regulator's own document states. A market observation comes from a named data series. A derived calculation is one we computed, with the working recorded on the claim.
Interpretations are counted, never netted out. This page will not display zero unsupported claims while interpretive sections sit outside the claim ledger, because that number would be true only by excluding the material most likely to be wrong.
A claim of one type is only treated as verified by a source of the matching type. A market observation is not verified by a regulator press release.
Sources
Primary sources
- Revision of Land Betterment Charge rates from 1 March 2026
Singapore Land Authority · 27 February 2026
- Revision of Land Betterment Charge Rates from 1 September 2026
Singapore Land Authority · 31 August 2026
- Land Betterment Charge
Singapore Land Authority
- Annex A, Table for Land Betterment Charge Rates per Square Metre, September 2026
Singapore Land Authority
Prevo provides research and informational analysis only. It is not a broker, investment adviser or fiduciary, and nothing on this site constitutes investment, legal, tax or financial advice. Verify independently.