Singapore · Cooling measure
Singapore raises ABSD, doubling foreign-buyer rate from 30% to 60%
Singapore raised ABSD rates effective 27 April 2023: foreigners 30% to 60%, entities and trusts 35% to 65% excluding qualifying housing developers, with smaller increases for SC and SPR additional properties.
Announced 26 April 2023 · Effective 27 April 2023
Sign in to save this event to your research. It is free.
This article has been corrected
3 material corrections have been made. The full record is at the end of this article.
Key numbers
In brief
On 26 April 2023, Singapore doubled the foreign-buyer ABSD from 30% to 60%, effective the next day, with smaller increases for citizens' and PRs' additional properties and a jump to 65% for entities. About 90% of transactions, first-home citizen and PR purchases, were untouched; the Government estimated roughly 10% would be affected. Foreign buying collapsed: from about 6.9% of purchases in Q1 2023 to under 2% by Q3, and around 1.5% by Q4. Yet the aggregate price index kept rising, up 6.8% for the year, because the market diverged: CCR non-landed fell while OCR rose 13.7% on local demand. The lesson: a prohibitive segment tax changes who buys and where demand lands, not necessarily what the market as a whole costs.
Why it mattersInterpretation
The episode demonstrates that buyer-targeted transaction taxes can materially alter buyer composition and geographic demand distribution without necessarily causing aggregate prices to fall. It is the prohibitive end-point of the ABSD instrument and the reference case for foreign-buyer policy changes.
What changed
ABSD
| Condition | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
| SC1st | 0% | 0% |
| SC2nd | 17% | 20% |
| SC3rd+ | 25% | 30% |
| SPR1st | 5% | 5% |
0% → 0%
17% → 20%
25% → 30%
5% → 5%
View all 11 conditionsHide the other 7
| SPR2nd | 25% | 30% |
| SPR3rd+ | 30% | 35% |
| FOREIGNER | 30% | 60% |
| ENTITY | 35% | 65% |
| entity rate for housing developersHOUSING DEVELOPERpotentially remittable subject to conditions | 35% | 35% |
| additional developer absdHOUSING DEVELOPERnon remittablepayable upfront | 5% | 5% |
| COVERED TRUSTEE | 35% | 65% |
25% → 30%
30% → 35%
30% → 60%
35% → 65%
35% → 35%
5% → 5%
35% → 65%
Effective for acquisitions on or after 27 April 2023. Entity/trust 65% excludes qualifying housing developers, who continued to face 35% subject to remission conditions plus the unchanged 5% non-remittable component.
Full event recordDates, regulator, scope, every stored claim value, the position before and the current status
Event facts
- Announced
- 26 April 2023
- Effective
- 27 April 2023
- Announcement to effective
- 1 day
- Regulator
- Monetary Authority of Singapore, Ministry of National Development, Ministry of Finance
- Instruments and scope
- Private residential property
- Claim 4
- 10%[MND/MOF/MAS joint press release, 26 April 2023; MND clarification on composition]
- Claim 11
- 1.7%[Contemporaneous consultancy analysis of URA REALIS caveat transactions, Q3 2023]
- Current status
- Active as introduced, no amendment recorded in this archive.
Market context
The market around the announcement
When this was announced on 26 April 2023, URA's latest quarterly figures were for 4Q2022, published 27 January 2023, 89 days earlier. The 1Q2023 figures followed two days after the announcement. The table carries on through four releases after it.
| Private residential | 2Q2022Jul 2022 | 3Q2022Oct 2022 | On the day4Q2022Jan 2023 | 1Q2023Apr 2023 | 2Q2023Jul 2023 | 3Q2023Oct 2023 | 4Q2023Jan 2024 | Trend | Change4Q2022 to 4Q2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prices | |||||||||
| Private home price index | 180.9 | 187.8 | 188.6 | 194.8 | 194.4 | 196.0 | 201.5 | +6.8% | |
| Non-landed, core central region | 141.2 | 144.4 | 145.4 | 146.6 | 146.5 | 142.5 | 148.1 | +1.9% | |
| Private rental index | 127.0 | 137.9 | 148.1 | 158.8 | 163.2 | 164.5 | 161.0 | +8.7% | |
| Sales | |||||||||
| New homes sold by developers | 2,397 | 2,187 | 690 | 1,256 | 2,127 | 1,946 | 1,092 | +58.3% | |
| Resales | 4,236 | 3,719 | 2,694 | 2,622 | 2,976 | 2,900 | 2,831 | +5.1% | |
| Sub-sales | 178 | 242 | 204 | 243 | 285 | 355 | 411 | +101.5% | |
| Units launched | 1,956 | 1,455 | 504 | 1,312 | 2,374 | 2,805 | 1,060 | +110.3% | |
| Supply | |||||||||
| Unsold, uncompleted, with planning approval | 15,805 | 15,677 | 16,024 | 16,252 | 17,484 | 16,747 | 16,929 | +5.6% | |
| Pipeline with planning approval | 48,836 | 49,384 | 46,041 | 44,846 | 44,157 | 36,949 | 34,251 | −25.6% | |
| Vacancy rate | 5.4% | 5.7% | 5.5% | 6.0% | 6.3% | 8.4% | 8.1% | +2.6 pts | |
Each figure is the quarter's own value as URA printed it in that quarter's release, not as later revised. Select a figure to see the annex and page it comes from.
Held back: URA prints the number in more than one place and the table's labels do not settle which one it is, so the archive stores it but does not show it.
We've seen this before
28 June 2013 · 29 June 2013
Why relevant
Anchor comparison, 2023 ABSD vs 2013 TDSR: a segment tax versus a credit-capacity constraint. TDSR asks "How much can this household safely borrow?" ABSD asks "How expensive should it be for this category of buyer to acquire another residential property?"
Where the comparison breaks
- Mechanism: transaction tax vs credit-capacity constraint
- Coverage: highly differentiated by buyer class vs broad across debt-funded purchasers
- Immediate channel: acquisition cost vs maximum borrowing capacity
- Observed response: sharp decline in foreign participation with resilience in locally driven segments vs sharp transaction slowdown followed by broad price weakness
- Policy character: demand-management cooling measure vs structural prudential framework
- Framework vs parameter: TDSR is a framework; ABSD rates are policy parameters within a transaction-tax regime; never treat framework changes and parameter changes as analytically equivalent merely because both are called cooling measures
What happened after
TDSR is the clearest Singapore example of system-wide credit-capacity control against which segment-specific demand control can be contrasted.
15 December 2021 · 16 December 2021
Why relevant
Direct predecessor in the policy sequence: the December 2021 round preceded September 2022 and April 2023. Chronological escalation, not a proven single-cause chain.
Where the comparison breaks
- Quasi-prohibitive doubling vs incremental calibration
- Primarily a buyer-segment tax escalation vs multi-instrument package
- Foreign participation collapsed after 2023; it recovered after 2021
What happened after
The 2021 round shows the incremental-calibration baseline against which the 2023 prohibitive response should be read.
Not a precedent for: Marginal rate calibration questions
What happens next
Q2-Q3 2023
Foreign-buyer participation collapse
Causality: HIGHShow detail
Foreign-buyer participation collapse
Foreigners' share of private residential purchases dropped to approximately 4.1-4.2% in Q2 2023 and approximately 1.7% in Q3 2023, down from roughly 6.9% in Q1 before the measure. By Q4 2023 estimates were around 1.5%. Q2 2023 is the transition quarter; Q3 2023 is the first full calendar quarter.
Interpretation
The measure was highly effective at suppressing foreign residential acquisition.
Why this grade
The ABSD increase directly targeted foreign purchasers, doubled their tax burden, and was followed by an immediate and unusually large decline in their transaction share. Contemporary agents and analysts independently identified the higher tax as the key deterrent. Other factors, including financing costs and broader market sentiment, may have contributed at the margin.
Q3 2023
Q3 2023 submarket divergence
Causality: MEDIUM-HIGHShow detail
Q3 2023 submarket divergence
Q3 2023 overall private residential prices rose +0.8% QoQ, masking substantial submarket divergence: CCR non-landed -2.7% QoQ; RCR non-landed +2.1%; OCR non-landed +5.5%.
Interpretation
The market did not simply stay resilient. It diverged.
Why this grade
MEDIUM-HIGH for the CCR-specific weakness, where the measure's exposure concentrated; OCR strength reflects local demand, not the policy. The single causality grade carries the CCR side; the split is recorded here per the audit.
calendar 2023
Full-year 2023 aggregate moderation and volume decline
Causality: MEDIUM-LOWShow detail
Full-year 2023 aggregate moderation and volume decline
Private residential prices increased 6.8% in calendar 2023, versus 8.6% in 2022. Annual trajectory: 2021 +10.6%, 2022 +8.6%, 2023 +6.8%, 2024 +3.9%. 2023 submarket divergence (non-landed): ccr +1.9%, rcr +3.1%, ocr +13.7%. Total private residential transaction volume fell 13% from 2022 to its lowest annual level since 2016.
Interpretation
A prohibitive segment tax changed who buys and where demand lands rather than what the market as a whole costs.
Why this grade
Audit grade medium / low: the slower aggregate price trajectory cannot be attributed to ABSD alone because rising housing completions, high financing costs, buyer price resistance, macroeconomic conditions and changing launch mix were occurring simultaneously.
0-6mo
Six-month characterisation: luxury/CCR thinning
Causality: MEDIUM-HIGHShow detail
Six-month characterisation: luxury/CCR thinning
Luxury/CCR volumes materially lower; the high-end condo market thinned. OCR pricing remained substantially more resilient. GCBs are excluded from this characterisation: GCB purchasers are subject to citizenship approval restrictions and are a structurally different market.
Interpretation
OCR resilience reflects the measure's much smaller direct exposure to foreign investment demand and continued local upgrader and owner-occupier demand. Analyst expectation, not verified outcome: contemporary analysts expected some prime-area projects to delay launches; do not record developer launch-slowing as an established outcome without project-level evidence.
Why this grade
The measure's exposure concentrated in foreign-buyer-dependent CCR segments; OCR strength is local demand, not a policy effect.
Prevo analysis
Prevo view
InterpretationSingapore's 2023 doubling of foreign-buyer ABSD cut foreign participation from roughly 6.9% to under 2% of purchases within two quarters while the aggregate price index kept rising, demonstrating that a prohibitive segment tax changes who buys and where demand lands rather than what the market as a whole costs.
Confidence: HIGH
The case for and the case against2
The case for
The measure was highly effective at its target: foreign share fell from ~6.9% to under 2% within two quarters, with HIGH causality; the tax doubled the burden and agents and analysts independently identified it as the deterrent. No broad price correction followed.
The case against
Aggregate price moderation through 2023-2024 cannot be attributed to ABSD alone (MEDIUM/LOW causality): completions, financing costs, buyer resistance and launch mix moved simultaneously. Volume fell 13% to the lowest level since 2016, and the CCR weakened materially, costs the headline index conceals.
What this view assumes3
- Foreign share estimates are URA-derived transaction analysis, MEDIUM-HIGH provenance
- GCBs are excluded from luxury-segment characterisations: structurally different market under citizenship approval restrictions
- Q2 2023 is the transition quarter; Q3 is the first full quarter
What we don't know2
- Developer launch-delay responses are analyst expectation, not verified without project-level evidence
- The aggregate price path without the measure is unobservable
Evidence behind this event
10 claims, 10 verified
- Causally established outcomes
- 0
- Interpretive sections, not claim-verifiableWhy it matters, Prevo View, The case for, The case against
- 4
Every claim, by type
Rates, figures and counts7
- Claim 1
Foreigner ABSD raised 30% -> 60%.
VERIFIED PRIMARY[MND/MOF/MAS joint press release, 26 April 2023; IRAS updated ABSD schedule]Subject to any applicable remission or Free Trade Agreement treatment. Certain nationals or permanent residents of FTA countries may qualify for treatment similar to Singapore Citizens. This does NOT alter the published general foreign-buyer rate of 60%; it alters who that rate reaches.
- Claim 3
SC second-property rate 17% -> 20%.
VERIFIED PRIMARY[MND/MOF/MAS joint press release, 26 April 2023; IRAS updated ABSD schedule] - Claim 4
The Government estimated that approximately 10% of residential transactions would be affected, based on 2022 data. The complementary official statement is that Singapore Citizen and Singapore Permanent Resident first-property purchases, approximately 90% of residential transactions on the same basis, were unchanged at 0% and 5%.
VERIFIED PRIMARYGovernment estimate[MND/MOF/MAS joint press release, 26 April 2023; MND clarification on composition]Official Government estimate, not a Prevo computation and not independently computed. Reference period 2022. Calculation author: the Singapore Government. The archive has never seen the underlying calculation, so the 10% and the complementary 90% stand or fall together as one government statement.
- Claim 6
Entities AND covered trustees: ABSD raised 35% to 65%. Housing developers, and trustees for housing developers, were excluded and remained at 35% potentially remittable plus the separate 5% non-remittable component.
VERIFIED PRIMARY[MND/MOF/MAS joint press release, 26 April 2023; IRAS updated ABSD schedule]The 65% rate reached entities and covered trustees, which the previous text omitted. Housing developers and trustees for housing developers were carved out and stayed at 35% potentially remittable plus 5% non-remittable, the structure introduced on 6 July 2018 and last moved on 16 December 2021.
- Claim 7
SC third and subsequent properties: ABSD 25% -> 30%. (Unnumbered in audit; factual layer.)
VERIFIED PRIMARY[MND/MOF/MAS joint press release, 26 April 2023; IRAS updated ABSD schedule] - Claim 8
SPR second property: ABSD 25% -> 30%. (Unnumbered in audit; factual layer.)
VERIFIED PRIMARY[MND/MOF/MAS joint press release, 26 April 2023; IRAS updated ABSD schedule] - Claim 9
SPR third and subsequent properties: ABSD 30% -> 35%. (Unnumbered in audit; factual layer.)
VERIFIED PRIMARY[MND/MOF/MAS joint press release, 26 April 2023; IRAS updated ABSD schedule]
Dates1
- Claim 2
Effective 27 April 2023.
VERIFIED PRIMARY[MND/MOF/MAS joint press release, 26 April 2023]Transitional provision, three conditions ALL of which had to hold: the OTP was granted on or before 26 April 2023; it was exercised on or before 17 May 2023 OR within its original validity period, whichever was EARLIER; and it was not varied on or after 27 April 2023.
Market observations2
- Claim 10
Contemporaneous consultancy analyses of URA REALIS caveat data estimated that foreigners accounted for approximately 4.1% to 4.2% of private residential purchases in Q2 2023. The precise result varied with transaction scope, extraction date and denominator.
VERIFIED MULTIPLE SECONDARY[Contemporaneous consultancy analyses of URA REALIS caveat transactions, Q2 2023]This is not a URA confidence interval and not a URA figure at all. URA does not publish nationality-share percentages in its standard quarterly release. The chain is: URA REALIS caveat records, then consultancy extraction and classification, then a calculated share, then media reporting. The 4.1% (Huttons) and 4.2% (OrangeTee, 205 non-landed homes) figures may reflect DIFFERENT scopes, extraction dates or denominators, so the spread is disagreement between two calculations rather than uncertainty within one.
- Claim 11
According to contemporaneous analysis of URA transaction records, foreigners accounted for approximately 1.7% of private residential purchases in Q3 2023.
VERIFIED MULTIPLE SECONDARY[Contemporaneous consultancy analysis of URA REALIS caveat transactions, Q3 2023]Approximate single value, NOT a range. The archive previously stored 1.7% to 1.9%; no credible source was located for 1.9% under the same calculation scope, and a range must never be manufactured to express general uncertainty. Same provenance chain as claim 10: URA REALIS caveat records, consultancy extraction and classification, calculated share, media reporting. NOT a URA published statistic.
How this is scored
Counts are by provenance, meaning who established the claim, not by how confident we are. A policy fact is one the regulator's own document states. A market observation comes from a named data series. A derived calculation is one we computed, with the working recorded on the claim.
Interpretations are counted, never netted out. This page will not display zero unsupported claims while interpretive sections sit outside the claim ledger, because that number would be true only by excluding the material most likely to be wrong.
A claim of one type is only treated as verified by a source of the matching type. A market observation is not verified by a regulator press release.
Claims are grouped by the type recorded on each one. Grouping hides nothing: every claim is in exactly one group, in full.
Sources
7 documents
Primary sources7
- MOF/MND/MAS joint press release: Measures for a Sustainable Property Market
Ministry of National Development · Published 26 April 2023
Cited by 8 claims, 8 verified
- Claim 1 · MND/MOF/MAS joint press release, 26 April 2023; IRAS updated ABSD schedule
- Claim 2 · MND/MOF/MAS joint press release, 26 April 2023
- Claim 3 · MND/MOF/MAS joint press release, 26 April 2023; IRAS updated ABSD schedule
- Claim 4 · MND/MOF/MAS joint press release, 26 April 2023; MND clarification on composition
- Claim 6 · MND/MOF/MAS joint press release, 26 April 2023; IRAS updated ABSD schedule
- Claim 7 · MND/MOF/MAS joint press release, 26 April 2023; IRAS updated ABSD schedule
- Claim 8 · MND/MOF/MAS joint press release, 26 April 2023; IRAS updated ABSD schedule
- Claim 9 · MND/MOF/MAS joint press release, 26 April 2023; IRAS updated ABSD schedule
- MAS copy of the joint release: Measures for a Sustainable Property Market
Monetary Authority of Singapore · Published 26 April 2023
Cited by 8 claims, 8 verified
- Claim 1 · MND/MOF/MAS joint press release, 26 April 2023; IRAS updated ABSD schedule
- Claim 2 · MND/MOF/MAS joint press release, 26 April 2023
- Claim 3 · MND/MOF/MAS joint press release, 26 April 2023; IRAS updated ABSD schedule
- Claim 4 · MND/MOF/MAS joint press release, 26 April 2023; MND clarification on composition
- Claim 6 · MND/MOF/MAS joint press release, 26 April 2023; IRAS updated ABSD schedule
- Claim 7 · MND/MOF/MAS joint press release, 26 April 2023; IRAS updated ABSD schedule
- Claim 8 · MND/MOF/MAS joint press release, 26 April 2023; IRAS updated ABSD schedule
- Claim 9 · MND/MOF/MAS joint press release, 26 April 2023; IRAS updated ABSD schedule
- Q2 2023 consultancy analyses of URA REALIS caveat transactions, nationality shares (Huttons approximately 4.1%, OrangeTee approximately 4.2% on 205 non-landed homes)
The Business Times · Published 1 July 2023
Not yet obtained: Prevo holds no copy of this document and no public address is stored
Cited by 1 claim; not obtained, so no claim is verified against it
- Claim 10 · Contemporaneous consultancy analyses of URA REALIS caveat transactions, Q2 2023
- URA Q2 2023 final quarterly private residential statistics
Urban Redevelopment Authority · Published 28 July 2023
Cited by 1 claim, 1 verified
- Claim 10 · Contemporaneous consultancy analyses of URA REALIS caveat transactions, Q2 2023
- Q3 2023 consultancy analysis of URA REALIS caveat transactions, nationality share approximately 1.7%
The Business Times · Published 1 October 2023
Not yet obtained: Prevo holds no copy of this document and no public address is stored
Cited by 1 claim; not obtained, so no claim is verified against it
- Claim 11 · Contemporaneous consultancy analysis of URA REALIS caveat transactions, Q3 2023
- URA Q3 2023 final quarterly private residential statistics
Urban Redevelopment Authority · Published 27 October 2023
Cited by 1 claim, 1 verified
- Claim 11 · Contemporaneous consultancy analysis of URA REALIS caveat transactions, Q3 2023
- IRAS historical ABSD rate schedule
Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore · Publication date not recorded
Cited by 6 claims, 6 verified
- Claim 1 · MND/MOF/MAS joint press release, 26 April 2023; IRAS updated ABSD schedule
- Claim 3 · MND/MOF/MAS joint press release, 26 April 2023; IRAS updated ABSD schedule
- Claim 6 · MND/MOF/MAS joint press release, 26 April 2023; IRAS updated ABSD schedule
- Claim 7 · MND/MOF/MAS joint press release, 26 April 2023; IRAS updated ABSD schedule
- Claim 8 · MND/MOF/MAS joint press release, 26 April 2023; IRAS updated ABSD schedule
- Claim 9 · MND/MOF/MAS joint press release, 26 April 2023; IRAS updated ABSD schedule
Event checked against its primary sources on 13 August 2026. Each claim keeps its own verification status.
Corrections
13 August 2026
Correction
Original: Foreigners' share of private residential purchases fell to approximately 1.7-1.9% in Q3 2023. [low 1.7, high 1.9]
Corrected: According to contemporaneous analysis of URA transaction records, foreigners accounted for approximately 1.7% of private residential purchases in Q3 2023. [value 1.7]
The evidence supports approximately 1.7% only. No credible source was located for 1.9% under the same calculation scope. The range was expressing general uncertainty rather than two sourced endpoints, which manufactures a precision boundary nobody published and reads as though someone measured both ends. Ranges are for cases like claim 10, where two named analyses disagree. Found in the founder primary-source pass.
13 August 2026
Correction
Original: Attributed to "URA quarterly private residential property statistics" (claims 10 and 11)
Corrected: Attributed to contemporaneous consultancy analyses of URA REALIS caveat transactions, with the URA quarterly releases attached separately for transaction context
URA does not publish nationality-share percentages in its standard quarterly release. The archive put a government masthead on a consultancy calculation, on the figure this event is best known for. The verification LEVEL was already honest at corroborated by several secondary sources; what was wrong was the SOURCE that level pointed at, which is a different defect and one a level cannot express. Applies to both claims 10 and 11 and to outcome 1. Found in the founder primary-source pass.
13 August 2026
Correction
Original: Third round of cooling measures since December 2021 (December 2021 -> September 2022 -> April 2023).
Corrected: DROPPED. No replacement claim. The policy sequence note now states the sequence by date rather than by ordinal.
Dropped as context rather than evidence, on the same reasoning as the other two. This one was additionally the most exposed claim in the archive: it asserted verified against the primary source with NO supporting document, which is the same shape as the June 2013 event claim 6 before its pass, and it was identified by the publish-readiness sweep three weeks before its own pass would have reached it. All three constituent events are seeded, so the sequence itself is fully recorded; only the ordinal is gone.
Prevo provides research and informational analysis only. It is not a broker, investment adviser or fiduciary, and nothing on this site constitutes investment, legal, tax or financial advice. Verify independently.